Thursday, September 19, 2013
I WANT ESTHER ANDERSON
Esther Anderson
Esther Anderson on NBC's Siberia. A very good and interesting show.
Check out more pix here.
Check out more pix here.
Sunday, September 15, 2013
I WANT RULA JEBREAL
Rula Jebreal works on MSNBC as a political pudit and journalist. She speaks mostly about the Middle East and Europe. Rula Jebreal is gorgeous.
The first time I saw her was on Bill Maher Real Time on HBO. I thought she was a model until she spoke. Not to say models don't say intelligent things but they don't normally speak on politics.
The first time I saw her was on Bill Maher Real Time on HBO. I thought she was a model until she spoke. Not to say models don't say intelligent things but they don't normally speak on politics.
Sunday, September 8, 2013
THE WRAITH MOVIE
THE WRAITH
Hollywood studios have been remaking or taking things from the 80s and making them into movies. I think one movie that needs to be remade is the WRAITH staring Charlie Sheen and Sherilyn Fenn.
This movie has murder, it has drag races, it has aliens or ghost, an alien or ghost supercar, bullies, drugs, and a love story. Done right this could be a blockbuster.
Dodge M4S Turbo Interceptor
The Interceptor was a living car. It's engine had quickening and what looked like a heartbeat. Well best I remember, been some years since I seen this movie. The interceptor was also the most interesting character in the whole damn movie. It had presence.
A possible choice for the new Wraith Interceptor is the Lamborghini Veneno. But would still have to call it Interceptor cause Veneno isn't intimidating.
Lamborghini Veneno
The two main songs from the movie I could never get out of my head especially Hold on blue eyes by La Marca. So if this movie is remade these two songs would also need an upgrade.
In the remake the love story may need a bit more depth than the original had.
I always thought the Wraith existed because of aliens. Anyone I knew who watched the movie thought it was aliens too. But I have learned that some think this is a ghost. The ghost thing makes no sense to me but it was an 80 movie so who knows.
P.S. no cameos with Charlie Sheen. If they want to give Sherilyn Fenn a spot that would be cool.
Teenage Girl Debates TV Host on GMOs
Rachel Parent debates Kevin O'Leary on CBC.
What I like about this debate is that the host only either seems to be on the corporations side or on the side of emotional what ifs. You may say that is what a debate is suppose to be, each person takes a side. But you have to remember this debate happens because they were already on the side of the corporations. The young girl speaks with simple wisdom, common sense and caution.
At one point the hosts say, "We are in a long term study, We're the experiment. We're the lab rats." That is an insane thought. What makes it insane is they say it with complete acceptance. Then they argue with her about having the choice of labels. They say it with the idea of complete acceptance of not having choice. So basically the hosts point of view is, we don't have a choice so just shut up and eat the GMO. And make yourself feel good because it may be helping someone who is living in poverty.
How the hosts are wrong:
One it is not scientific to do studies then not let any other scientific individuals or group collaborate your findings separately.
Two it is not responsible science to experiment on a large uncontrolled group of test subjects(us).
Three GMOs are in all corporate food. There a plenty of other sources for food. Especially in North America.
Four GMOs are not ending hunger. Also their is no evidence it will end hunger.
Five even it GMOs created the yields to end world wide hunger. Because they are GMOs, the products created from them will belong to the corporations. Which means, if you can not afford it, you will not be able to attain it. So if your poor in a third world country and can't afford it now why would you afford it then.
Six to be against GMOs is not being against science. It's about being against being a "lab rat".
Seven only an idiot would just accept what some large corporation says about something being healthy. Corporations are about profit. And everyone knows if a corporation can pollute something, place or person in slow increments they will. Why? Because that way they can say they are not the cause or the only cause of what ever ills may befall the something, place or person.
Eight Totalitarianism describe a system in which the state(corporation) holds total authority over the society and seeks to control all aspects of public and private life wherever possible - This is what the hosts mean when they say you have no choice.
What I like about this debate is that the host only either seems to be on the corporations side or on the side of emotional what ifs. You may say that is what a debate is suppose to be, each person takes a side. But you have to remember this debate happens because they were already on the side of the corporations. The young girl speaks with simple wisdom, common sense and caution.
At one point the hosts say, "We are in a long term study, We're the experiment. We're the lab rats." That is an insane thought. What makes it insane is they say it with complete acceptance. Then they argue with her about having the choice of labels. They say it with the idea of complete acceptance of not having choice. So basically the hosts point of view is, we don't have a choice so just shut up and eat the GMO. And make yourself feel good because it may be helping someone who is living in poverty.
How the hosts are wrong:
One it is not scientific to do studies then not let any other scientific individuals or group collaborate your findings separately.
Two it is not responsible science to experiment on a large uncontrolled group of test subjects(us).
Three GMOs are in all corporate food. There a plenty of other sources for food. Especially in North America.
Four GMOs are not ending hunger. Also their is no evidence it will end hunger.
Five even it GMOs created the yields to end world wide hunger. Because they are GMOs, the products created from them will belong to the corporations. Which means, if you can not afford it, you will not be able to attain it. So if your poor in a third world country and can't afford it now why would you afford it then.
Six to be against GMOs is not being against science. It's about being against being a "lab rat".
Seven only an idiot would just accept what some large corporation says about something being healthy. Corporations are about profit. And everyone knows if a corporation can pollute something, place or person in slow increments they will. Why? Because that way they can say they are not the cause or the only cause of what ever ills may befall the something, place or person.
Eight Totalitarianism describe a system in which the state(corporation) holds total authority over the society and seeks to control all aspects of public and private life wherever possible - This is what the hosts mean when they say you have no choice.
Saturday, September 7, 2013
Spellbound: Crimes of the Mind
Pure Science Specials Spellbound: Crimes of the Mind talks about Pukua, mind manipulation and some say magic to control others. Pukua is everything from street magic used to steal money from a person on the streets of Indonesia. Too hypnosis to control people and get them to give money and jewels. Or perhaps also hypnosis with trigger words on whole families allowing them to be robbed in their sleep. Or in one case to rape women yet they are unaware until morning.
Super Cells
Pure Science Specials Super Cells travels to East Asia. China, Thailand, and other Asian countries have made an industry from Stem Cells( embryonic, cord blood, and adult). Many Westerners travel to these country to receive stem cell treatment they can not receive at home where treatment and perhaps research is illegal. For some the treatment works they call it a miracle. For others there is little to no affect but this seems to be the case in serious brain or debilitating disease in the film.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)